On the issues of NAFTA and trade with China, who do you believe can do a better job at promoting fair trade and preventing further job displacement and also strengthen American manufacturing once again?
I’d have to go with Ron Paul. He understands the monetary system and fiscal policy perhaps better than any other candidate, Republican or Democrat. He has served his district as a Congressman in Texas for 20 years. He has consistently voted against programs such as NAFTA, that give incentives for companies to search for cheap non-American labor and push our productive manufacturing jobs overseas.
Quite frankly, a vote for Huckabee, McCain, Clinton, or Obama is going to be a vote for the status quo in the future (although I dare say Obama may actually be more of a change than the others). Sure, the other candidates may move a few troops here and there, try to threaten Mexico into giving us more beneficial trading provisions, but none will actually do what is needed and pull out of NAFTA, which is not working in our best interests.
Not to mention he has spent years advocating responsible government with limited power over individuals. Vote Ron Paul, because it is an important time to send a message about what our government ought to be.
Not the Socialist Democrats
References :
Most defiantly Hillary is going to do a better job. Obama is just going to give money to the arabs and support their way of life.
References :
The ONE person that openly discussed that issue was laughed at and called a kook…
Maybe next time people will listen better.
Everyone that is left is a member of the CFR and that organization is promoting this.
If ANY candidate that is left says that they are against NAFTA and the NAFTA Superhighway….THEY ARE LYING.
References :
Obama.
Hillary and her husband *created* NAFTA, for pete’s sake.
References :
No one…..
If your going to have trade agreements you have to take the good with the bad..
You can’t have an agreement that protects jobs or certain industries ….
Your alternative is to have no agreements and become self reliant for all your own goods….. it worked well for the Soviet bloc .. I’m sure it would have the same effect here….
References :
Obama. Clinton and her hubby were behind NAFTA to begin with.
References :
Huckabee.
References :
Hillary has the best economy plan
That include McCain
References :
If you want who is best for this country, and can change things from what they are now, and the one who can handle better the problems you have ask about, then there is only one person.
And that is Hillary Clinton
References :
I’d have to say Ron Paul.
References :
I’d have to go with Ron Paul. He understands the monetary system and fiscal policy perhaps better than any other candidate, Republican or Democrat. He has served his district as a Congressman in Texas for 20 years. He has consistently voted against programs such as NAFTA, that give incentives for companies to search for cheap non-American labor and push our productive manufacturing jobs overseas.
Quite frankly, a vote for Huckabee, McCain, Clinton, or Obama is going to be a vote for the status quo in the future (although I dare say Obama may actually be more of a change than the others). Sure, the other candidates may move a few troops here and there, try to threaten Mexico into giving us more beneficial trading provisions, but none will actually do what is needed and pull out of NAFTA, which is not working in our best interests.
Not to mention he has spent years advocating responsible government with limited power over individuals. Vote Ron Paul, because it is an important time to send a message about what our government ought to be.
References :
Being Hillary had a hand in creating NAFTA she isn’t about to dissolve it or change it. Vote Obama for the change America needs.
References :