I hear wing nuts raving about it. But, what say the libs? Is this the agenda or is Glenn Beck totally wrong? The next question would be: Is that the mainstream of the Democratic Party?
12 thoughts on “Is the Progressive/Liberal/Democratic Party movement in America against Socialism and Marxism?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
yes gleen beck is wrong and we just think the alot if those right wing guys are out of their mind
The number of socialists in this nation is negligible. Calling Obama a communist is like saying republicans believe that minimum wage and child labor laws should be abolished.
There are many Democrats who are moderate. It’s just that Barack Obama has moved so far to the left so fast that the GOP is making a huge comeback. VA and NJ are both electing conservatives for the governorships in their respective states.
I think it is, but again People tell me that communism isn’t bad, Just people so it doesn’t work for people because people are bad. Which is why it’s pretty sad to see people who are “Fair and balanced” talk about who’s right and who’s wrong. What we should think and how we should feel. I’m watching CNN again. at least they let me think for myself.
No., the progressive, liberal movement IS socialism and marxism
They greatly exaggerate.
Social Security
Medicare
The vast majority of Americans think these are a good idea. The Republicans even passed a major enhancement of Medicare — the Prescription Drug benefit — when they were in power.
How can you call others wing nuts when the answer to this question is as obvious as the nose on your face?
You must be very young. If you are, get to bed.
Socialism and Marxism are the the staples of Progressives/liberals, and a number of people in the Democratic party. So no, they are not against that particular political thought.
You’re missing the point.
The average democratic citizen may not be necessarily for it, but the democratic leaders are. And if they were for it, why would they tell you anyway?
BTW: democracy is the first step to cummunism, and America was founded as a constitutional republic.
If you hear only one voice, i. e. ,Glen Beck, an admitted and well known nut case for conservatism, in spite of all of its’ obvious and most recent failures of same then, logically the next question would seem to be, what viable alternative do you have to offer. You may not play the same hand, by the way. You may not disown your former hand and in any other form, ‘Cheat’ to create a false and repugnant political agenda yet again for no substantial purpose. Does this seem reasonable? Why then assume that everyone else is necessarily so gullible?
the platform of today’s elephants is far more similar to the donkey party of the 60s,,low taxes on business,limited government,religious & press freedom,,,,,,repubs today favor civil rights(as passed in 64,65),using govt coercion,if necessary, to see to enforcement,the dems ,lotta southern dems,and northern big city mayors,resisted civil rights advancement,,the dem lib donkey party of today has wandered left, close to the deep end marxist/internationalists/revisionists
I would say that Glenn is on to something that really gets Liberals feathers ruffled. Otherwise he would be a non-issue. You will notice he comes with facts, researched, double-checked. Sure he gets a little nutty, but that’s what all people that are passionate about what they believe do. Take a look at Al Gore. That guy flips out sometimes!
I do say Liberals because not all Democrats are. I used to be a Democrat before it was hijacked by Liberals, and can’t be a Republican because neo-cons hijacked that. . .
Hence my being a Libertarian, and people like me that like Mr. Beck. Moderates and Independents and right of center folks all like him.
Hence his ratings. . .