Series: Republican Artist: Unknown Period: Source country: USA Source Year: 1900 20inch by 30 inch poster print on standard paper. All files are stored digitally and are ready for reproduction. The quality is closely monitored to ensure professional results.

Read the rest of this entry »

Democratic Party Alphabet 12×18 Giclee on canvas by Buyenlarge Series: Democrat Artist: Unknown Period: Source country: USA Source Year: 1900 12 inch by 18 inch Giclee print on Canvas. All files are stored digitally and are ready for reproduction. The quality is closely monitored to ensure

Read the rest of this entry »

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/To-get-votes-Waxman-offers-cap-and-trade-breaks_04_24-43592342.html

Waxman is a turd.

information on these things…Proposed legislation, what the law could be, proposed guidelines,
proposed racetrack casinos, slots, etc

Gambling is already legal in Texas. Not only do we have the lottery but we also have racetracks, etc. Private casinos

The Governor of the State of Texas is Rick Perry

On the issues of NAFTA and trade with China, who do you believe can do a better job at promoting fair trade and preventing further job displacement and also strengthen American manufacturing once again?

I’d have to go with Ron Paul. He understands the monetary system and fiscal policy perhaps better than any other candidate, Republican or Democrat. He has served his district as a Congressman in Texas for 20 years. He has consistently voted against programs such as NAFTA, that give incentives for companies to search for cheap non-American labor and push our productive manufacturing jobs overseas.

Quite frankly, a vote for Huckabee, McCain, Clinton, or Obama is going to be a vote for the status quo in the future (although I dare say Obama may actually be more of a change than the others). Sure, the other candidates may move a few troops here and there, try to threaten Mexico into giving us more beneficial trading provisions, but none will actually do what is needed and pull out of NAFTA, which is not working in our best interests.

Not to mention he has spent years advocating responsible government with limited power over individuals. Vote Ron Paul, because it is an important time to send a message about what our government ought to be.

Obama Campaign Runs Afoul of Finance Rules

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 8:25 PM

By: Kenneth R. Timmerman

A Newsmax investigation of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign finance reports has turned up more than 2,000 cases in which individuals have made donations far above the legal limit of $2,300 per election.

Such donations, if not returned within 60 days, violate federal campaign finance laws.

Some can be chalked up to common names, such as Michael Brown, William Taylor, or James Smith.

But many others cannot.

On Aug. 31, for example, the Obama campaign filed a report listing a single donation from a Debra Myers in “Rancho Palos Verde, Calif.,” for $28,500 – more than 10 times the amount the law allows per election. Although Debra Myers is identified as a physician, only two individuals with that last name have a listed phone number in Rancho Palos Verdes (the city’s name actually does have an “s” at the end). Neither is a Debra or a “D” Myers, or a physician.

The Obama campaign also identified Woodrow Myers Jr. of Indianapolis, Ind., on Aug. 31 as having given $28,500 to the campaign. Woodrow “Woody” Myers is a former Indiana state health commissioner who spent $2.1 million of his own money in a failed special election to challenge Andre Carson, the grandson of U.S. Rep. Julia Carson, who died in December. The younger Carson won the race this year, with heavy backing from lobbyists, the Democratic Party and related PACs. (Interestingly, Woodrow Myers’ wife is identified as Debra, although Newsmax could not confirm whether this is the same Debra Myers the campaign report lists as being from Palos Verdes.)

In an initial reply to Newsmax questions, the Obama campaign said it had refunded both contributions on Sept. 30, a day after a Newsmax investigation was published that revealed extensive federal election campaign violations by the campaign.

The Republican National Committee cited that earlier Newsmax investigation in a formal complaint against the Obama campaign with the Federal Election Commission on Monday.

Several hours later, Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt e-mailed Newsmax to say that the contributions had been “reattributed” to the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee with the Democratic National Committee, and that the excess had been refunded.

That still put both Debra Myers and Woodrow Myers over the federal limits – unless the Obama campaign refunded their entire checks, since Debra gave another $28,500 earlier in the year to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Woodrow was way over the $108,2000 overall election cycle limit for individuals.

Individuals can give $2,300 to a federal candidate in both the primary and the general election, for a total of $4,600 in a single election cycle. They also can give $28,500 to a national party committee, $10,000 to a state or local committee, and $5,000 to other political committees.

If a candidate loses the primary, any money counted toward the general election must be refunded, a wrinkle in the federal election laws that can sink losing candidates deep in debt.

In exchange for receiving federal funding, the McCain campaign agreed not to take any money from individual donors for the general election, so its donors are limited to $2,300.

In addition to Debra Myers and Woodrow Meyers, hundreds of other individual donors have given to the Obama campaign far in excess of the legal limit, a Newsmax analysis of campaign finance records shows.

Among them:

# James Sievers of Big Sky, Mont., gave a total of $20,700 to the campaign, in five donations between March and June of this year. The campaign has returned close to $7,000 of the money but has kept the rest.

# Martin Dies of Austin, Texas, also gave $20,700 to the campaign, in four separate checks, each dated June 30, 2007. The campaign returned $2,300 of it immediately, and another $4,600 in September, but kept $13,800 – three times the legal limit.

# Robert Watt of Brooklyn, N.Y., gave close to $17,000 to the campaign starting in February of this year, including a whopping $10,000 check logged by the campaign on Aug. 31. Despite the obvious violation of the campaign limits, FEC records show that the campaign returned just $2,300.

# Ryan Finley of Portland, Ore., has given $15,400 to Obama for America, starting with two checks on March 6, 2007, totaling $6,900. The campaign immediately returned $2,300, bringing him within the legal limit. He gave another $8,500 in a lump sum on Aug. 26, 2008.

# Ms. Merry T. O’Donnell of Juno Beach, Fla., has given $13,150 to the Obama campaign, starting with three donations in March 2007 that totaled $2,000. In January 2008, she gave two more donations of $1,000 each, as well as donations for $600 and for $2,000. In February, she gave another $4,600. As of the latest filing, the campaign has refunded just $2,300 of the total, leaving her net donations at over two times the legal limit
# Jerry Rubin of Whitefish Bay, Wis., has given $12,700 to the Obama campaign in varying amounts since February 2007. Despite the obvious violation, the campaign has refunded just $3,400 of that total, still putting him at double the legal limit.

These are just a sampling of the 2,087 individuals who have given Obama more than the $4,600 combined total for the primaries and the general election.

Donors with common names but who live in different parts of the country are among these 2,087 names. For example, the top individual contributor is Michael Brown, listed as giving $36,706 to the campaign.

But a closer look turns up what appear to be 46 different people sharing the same name, each giving addresses in different cities around the United States.

Newsmax has screened donors appearing in the FEC database to weed out those with similar names and different addresses.

For example, in the examples listed in this article, we have eliminated any donations from individuals with the sa
For example, in the examples listed in this article, we have eliminated any donations from individuals with the same name who are listed as having a different address.
The FEC regularly sends letters to the Obama campaign, questioning contributions that appear to go over the legal limits. In many cases, the Obama campaign has amended its reports as a result.

But the examples cited here have not been amended.

“It is illegal to make contributions in excess of the limits, and it is illegal to receive contributions in excess of the limits,” FEC spokesman Bob Biersack told Newsmax.

So both the donors and the campaign may have broken the law. “But there are lots of circumstances, and until the four commissioners have agreed to rule, it’s hard to judge,” he said.

Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt told Newsmax that the McCain campaign also has caught excess donations and has “refunded $1.2 million in contributions.”

Sean Cairncross, the general counsel for the Republican National Committee who filed the complaint with the FEC on Monday, told Newsmax that the McCain campaign has been “completely transparent with respect to its contributions” by making
“The Obama campaign has steadfastly refused to make that information public,” he said.

Referring specifically to the huge amount of money that the Obama campaign claims it has raised from small donors, Cairncross said the identity and nationality of those donors could very well remain secret until well after the election unless the Obama campaign makes their names public.

“The American people deserve to know where $250 million in contributions — money that could potentially elect a president — is coming from,” he said. “And at this point, we have no way of knowing.”

he IS a law violation

Seems to me that the country is tired of the republican party but hesitant to vote in a black president. Do you think if a white person such as Al Gore would have ran, the democratic party would win in a landslide victory ?
For everyone thinking I’m racist.. I’m part hispanic and black. The reason I bring this is up is that it seems odd that the year that the republicans and seem backed in to a corner, the two weakest (in popularity) types of candidates were chosen. A minority and a woman.

If people vote for the President based solely on race than what does that say about this country? Gore is as big as a moron as Obama. Obama has no strategy, he is nothing more than a smooth talking speech maker. Remember Obama is half white, so the half white candidate is not qualified as well.

We need to put a stop to this president, but the U.S. Senators of the Republican party, time after time Vote for the President 85%+ of the time, and anything to do with the war or to over ride the presidents Veto, the Republican Senators have no balls to over run, this president. So this next year i’m not a Republican anymore, I will vote against the Republican party the rest of my life, which under Bush may not be much longer.

How many of you feel the same way!

I’ve been a Republican for half a century. I’m not going to vote for any Republican until they rid the party of the neocon vermin that has usurped it.

Tom Tancredo; Tom DeLay; Rick Santorum; James Dobson

There are quite a few McCain haters who could feel like playing the spoiler just to increase their own profiles.

Will one of them run?

Can McCain win a single state if they do?

The latest poll says that Obama would win Texas if they do. Texas doesn’t even have a large African American population.
In McCain-Obama-Santorum, I think Obama wins Alabama, Mississippi and the rest of the heavily black/heavily Christian right states fairly easily.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/21/texas.poll/index.htm

Note this poll is before any of this lobbyist/affair stuff came out…
Note: I didn’t say that the con 3rd party guy would win any states. I think they wouldn’t. They’d do it for the same reason Nader did — to make a point.
I think the results would probably be pretty similar to the TX poll in most of the red states:

Obama 41
McCain 37
ThirdParty 19

Obama would win the blue states very easily.

Tom Delay will drive moderate and conservatives toward McCain. Delay has way too much baggage.

Tancredo and Santorum don’t have the name recognition country wide and many will remember the scandals of Rick Santorum. James Dobson? Isn’t he one of those religious fanatics? He can only hope for a couple of the southern states.

If Bloomberg gets in then McCain has a horse race on his hands.